Editorial policy

Our editorial aim is to make a specific question easier to answer without hiding uncertainty. This policy applies to the CasinoLupen journal, guides, explanatory tools and supporting pages.

Start with sources that can support the claim

We prefer the original source for a factual claim: regulator registers for licensing records, official network documentation for payment mechanics, game rules for a particular configuration and an operator’s current terms for its own conditions. These sources have different scopes. None should be used to prove something it does not establish.

Sources are listed with each guide and linked near important claims where useful. A source review date describes when the listed material was checked. It does not promise that an external page or an operator’s conditions remain unchanged.

Separate facts, examples and observations

Worked examples use explicit assumptions and are labelled as hypothetical. They are not current offers unless an article specifically identifies an offer and its evidence. Calculations explain the stated inputs; they do not predict a gambling result.

We do not invent account registrations, deposits, withdrawals, test sessions, customer experiences or expert endorsements. A documented observation, if used, must state what was observed and its limits. A single observation cannot establish how every account will be treated.

Publisher responsibility

CasinoLupen is the named publisher. We do not attach fictional people or unsupported qualifications to articles. Research and drafting tools may assist preparation, but their output is not itself evidence. The published text must stand on identifiable sources, transparent calculations and clearly stated limitations.

Commercial context

A commercial relationship must be disclosed where it is relevant to a recommendation or referral. Payment cannot turn an unverified claim into a verified fact. Sponsored or referral links, if introduced, must be distinguishable from ordinary editorial source links. See our affiliate disclosure.

Dates and revisions

Publication dates show when an article becomes public. An updated date should correspond to an actual change, not a cosmetic refresh intended to make old information appear newly researched. Scheduled publication does not by itself represent a fresh review of external sources.

Evergreen explanations can remain useful while external terms change. Readers should check the original source before acting on a time-sensitive detail. We revise or qualify a claim when credible new evidence changes its meaning.

Corrections and reader reports

Send the page address, the disputed passage and supporting evidence to contact@casinolupen.com. We assess reports on their substance. Material factual corrections should be explained on the affected page; minor spelling and formatting repairs need not create a separate notice.

We do not promise a response within a fixed time. Please do not send identity documents, wallet recovery information or unrelated private account records.